TV Weathermen Aren’t Scientists

In a nearby riding, Kitchener Centre, Progressive Conservative candidate Dave MacDonald is running for election for the Ontario government. He is a former weatherman for the CTV network in southwestern Ontario. In Canada, there is no accreditation to allow the qualified to say they are a meteorologist. So, anyone can say they are a meteorologist, including Dave MacDonald.

Here is an article stating that MacDonald has little or no qualifications. It also gives his quote: “There’s still a lot of controversy over what the cause of climate change is.” He’s trying to give the impression that any climate change observed might not be man made. He’s setting up his poor environmental record party to get out of paying for anything environmentally conscious.

The jury is not out on the man made cause of climate changes. We’ve changed climate at least since the 1940’s with cloud seeding which changed the amount and timing of precipitation. The jet age ushered in contrails which have both cooling and heating effects on climate. The ozone layer has both dwindled and rebounded due to the effects of man and legislation. This effects the quality of sunlight on earth and thus the climate.

Notice I haven’t mentioned the obvious build up of carbon in our atmosphere and its effect of warming up the atmosphere. See Venus if you don’t believe the greenhouse effect. It’s the hottest planet but it is further from the Sun than Mercury.

It is so obvious that man fundamentally changes his entire environment now, that the current age is called the Anthropocene. Yes, this is a geological term – we have such a major effect on our planet that it is being noticed in rock formation all over the world. The anthropo prefix stands for human.

Maybe Dave MacDonald is too ignorant to want to memorize the pronunciation or spelling of Anthropocene. This might tax his science technician brain.

But this slight hint of science credibility really seemed to “work” for the federal Conservatives. Gary Goodyear used his chiropractor skills as an in to get the minister position for science and technology. Would we put a technician in charge of a PHD with lots of experience? The federal Conservatives would, especially if he tried to open the door for creationists to also be in charge of the scientists.

But back to weather man credentials. Here are the lyrics to the Arrogant Worms song “TV Weather Guy”. You can even listen to the song for free there or purchase it. The Arrogant Worms could easily have written this about Dave MacDonald, even though they were writing from Kingston, not Kitchener.

Posted in Music, Politics, Science, Wee Bit O' Humour | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Famine and Cannibalism

In my news watching lifetime there have been three big famines: the Ethiopian famine of Bob Geldof fame, the Malawi famine of 2002 which was given little press, and the current Horn of Africa famine.

Despite brutal circumstances and horrible decisions to make, I haven’t heard of even a single one of the famine victims resorting to cannibalism. I’ve tried Internet searches to see if the famine and cannibalism have been linked at all and I don’t see even one rumour about it. And faced with death, I know that some people have made a different decision than these people in the past.

Turning their backs on cannibalism also occurred in the other two famines I’ve mentioned. I don’t know if this honourable behaviour in a bad situation is cultural or just shows a high moral character.

Certainly these peoples may not have been savvy enough to sock away money or food or use insurance as the more sophisticated and much wealthier developed world does. But do we in the developed world have a high moral character as these peoples do?

You see, I live in Canada, a developed country that is also home of the famous “Northwest Passage” that many explorers risked their lives for and many people lost their lives over. And of the 3 Franklin expeditions up there, two had problems with cannibalism.

Maybe this one explorer was just specially tainted. But also in American history, early Jamestown had cannibalism problems.

And we’ve all heard about seafaring people stuck in lifeboats in the middle of the ocean resorting to cannibalism.

Why is it that developed world people faced with death will make the lower moral choice of eating their own?

I’ve feared overpopulation, especially from the developing world, straining humanity’s resources past the limit. Decades ago there seemed to be no check to rising populations in the developing world. But more recently I’ve heard that the developing world is moving into cities and this movement leads to an almost stagnant birth rate. Earth’s population might actually stabilize soon.

And if it doesn’t? Well the developed world has the best weaponry and if the world ever lacks enough food to feed it, the developed world will make its same choice when faced with starvation. Cannibalism will occur but this time it won’t be of people you know. The developed world will send raiding parties into the developing world for meat.

Like always we will say that the situation forced us to.

People from the Horn of Africa could say the same. They just don’t. So why is it a stock cartoon to show the innocent explorers being cooked for the hungry dark skinned people? The reverse seems even more likely.

 

“Franklin, I’m thinking that instead of lugging this 1000 pound pot around, we could have just brought 1000 pounds of meat.”

Posted in History, Politics, Social Science, Wee Bit O' Humour | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Future of Tobacco

I’m going to put on my lawful evil cap today to describe where big tobacco is today and where it will be tomorrow.

For years big tobacco has faced declining sales in the developed world. To offset this they have increased sales to the developing world. It is easy to be lawful evil there, especially when enough money given to the right hands can craft the law there.

Still, there will always be developed world “seep”. Important health information will eventually find its way to the developing world. So I only give big tobacco 100 years before they will be accountable enough to face shrinking sales there.

So what’s next for big tobacco? Of course finding aliens is perhaps the ultimate goal of big tobacco. But let’s face facts – alien brains will be unlikely to produce an addiction response when on tobacco.

So I say it will only be natural for big tobacco to go after the only untapped earth market I know about – animals.

In more than one developing world zoo, there have been cases of primates getting addicted to cigarettes. I gather that customers give the cigarettes to the primates. This link shows a chimp smoking in a South Africa zoo. Unlike aliens, it looks like these beasts can become addicted, too. This is just the start.

It is my opinion, in the desire to do evil and shorten already short lives, big tobacco will do some possible good by developing prosthetics so more than just primates can smoke.

Do you have an indoor cat? With the proper smoking prosthetic it can smoke. Prompting you, developed world reader, to make it go outside to smoke.

Other cats in the neighbourhood will see your Fluffy smoke and get to go outside and thus more cats will take up smoking in an avalanche of new sales for big tobacco.

Big tobacco will not stop till every type of animal becomes addicted. They will develop even more prosthetics so these animals can pay off big tobacco.

And big tobacco will cross their collective fingers and hope that most animals are too stupid to realize they are collectively shortening their lives.

And maybe, just maybe animals have been waiting for the chance to get proper prosthetics so they can rise against human overlords. Maybe when they rise up, big tobacco will finally die once and for all.

As for me, it’s been 5 years since I kicked my tobacco addiction. I’m never going to try a cigarette again because I think I’ll be just as addicted as I was for 25 years.

Posted in Business, Humour, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Glowing Cats

Now that the world has discovered green glowing cats the question is why. This article gives a picture as well as a more complete story. Apparently scientists inserted monkey genes in cat eggs that protected against feline AIDS. As a marker for these genes, glowing genes from jellyfish were also added to the cat eggs.

Was it necessary for the scientists to use such complex reasoning to make glowing cats? In this post, I thought of a few simpler reasons to produce glow in the dark cats.

For far too long busker jugglers have had only the option of juggling with fire at night time. Might I suggest glow in the dark kitties for night time busking? Of course the busker would need some very thick gloves for all the scratches he’s going to get. Especially since the cats will always land claw side down in the juggler’s hands.

A more peaceful and obvious way to use glow in the dark kitties is as a simple night light for young children. Glow in the dark kitties are known for chasing childhood monsters away better than any normal night light.

Of course the kitty will have to be manacled to stay in roughly the same spot. And for hygiene it would be necessary to also put the kitty litter in the child’s room. But anything that calms junior so the adults can get some sleep is welcome.

While they are still rare, glowing cats can most obviously be used as bribes for world peace. Want to tone down the rhetoric from North Korea? Give Kim Jong Il a glow in the dark kitty. Of course the citizenry may have eaten all the mice because of starvation, so the cat might die. But we can give Kim Jong Il a new cat on occasion if he starves and eats the first one.

Does Mahmoud Ahmadinejad have you down with ongoing nuclear aspirations? “Here,” we can say to the hard liner, “You don’t need nuclear to build glow in the dark cats!” And perhaps he’ll be satisfied enough to stop all nuclear ambitions.

Posted in Humour, Pets, Politics, Science | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why Cats Don’t Rule the World – Yet

What follows are the reasons that cats have not become our overlords yet. Despite what they might think.

1)They stealthily stalk new people, but instead of pouncing on them, cats sniff their feet. Sorry cats, but that’s not really regal.

2)To cats, change in the environment is so distracting they can’t focus on anything else. Rulers can’t afford the luxury of sniffing, licking and marking things with their cheek glands every time something is moved slightly.

3)With only the exception of kittens, Cats tend to kill everything that is smaller than themselves. Given the power, cats would kill EVERYTHING smaller than themselves thus ruining all Earth’s ecosystems. And you think men are doing a good job of destabilizing the environment.

4)Cats do a good job of imitating royalty by making men pick up and remove their $#!+ and urine. However some cats have shown they can be trained into using the toilet. Some even flush it. With such extreme backsliding cats aren’t as imperial as they once were.

5)Cats ruin their would be royal palate by licking their @$$es. And everyone knows that fine gastronomical tastes help define any would be upper class.

6)They ruin our estimation of their intellect by only vocalizing one word.

7)They don’t demand access to all of the great outdoors, as long as they have a window to sun in.

8)It’s hard to strike fear in the hearts of underlings when all cats are known to be deathly afraid of the common vacuum cleaner.

And finally,

9)They sold out that right eons ago all for the ability to get fish, some string to play with and for a bit of petting.

Posted in Humour, Pets, Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Waterloo Region Citizens

I’ve had a handful of searches land on my site looking up “geographical humour”. I’m a bit surprised because I thought that those who were into geography were, as a rule, humourless. Since this might not be the case, I have more geographical humour for my area. It takes that old question, what to call citizens of a specific town, and through humour, degradation and puns tries to answer this for Waterloo Region. Here is my map to get a lay of the land. Waterloo Region is in southwestern Ontario, about 100 km west of Toronto.

Warning. Extreme pun alert. Nearly everything that follows will have a pun or three.

Well let’s start with the cities. Kitchener is the largest city and I believe the inhabitants should be called KitcheNERDs. That’s right, I’m going to emphasize every pun with capital letters. Like wise Waterloo residents should be called WaterLOONIES, and Cambridge residents should be called Cambridge Copycats. Why should it be this non pun? Simply put, I think in 1973 when Cambridge was formed they thought ahead to this very post and decided to name themselves something hard to corrupt. Others had noticed this incorruptibility in the past which is why there are almost as many Cambridges in the English speaking world as there are Springfields.

Four towns in Waterloo Region end in -berg or -burg so of course they will be called New HamBURGERs, BamBURGERs, PetersBURGERs and HeidelBURGERs. Then there are the -villes. Roseville natives should be called RoseVILLAINs, and Hawkesville natives should be called HawkesVILLAINs. People of the -dales ought to call themselves FloraDILDOs and BloomingDILDOs. The same insult can be used on the -hills, CrossDILDOs and MaryDILDOs.

I couldn’t corrupt a Saint so the 2nd part of these names needed to be worked upon. People from St. Jacobs, St. Clements, and St. Agatha become St. JakeOBSOLETEs, St. ClemENTRAILs, and St. AGHASTLIEs.

Of all the towns I think I’m letting Elmira off the easiest, calling its inhabitants ElmiraNITES. If you’re not from this area you might never get the play on the religious sect name, Mennonites, which Elmira has aplenty. From Conestogo you might have ConesTOKERs. You might see the WinterBURNT in Winterbourne. West Montrose would have West MontPOSERs.

WallensTEENIEs are from Wallenstein, LinWOODIEs hail from Linwood, WellesLEECHes are from Wellesley.

IRON Badens come from Baden, New DunDWEEBs are from New Dundee and AYR HEADs are from Ayr.

And that is my region and hopefully I’m all punned out for my next few posts.

Posted in Geography, Humour, Language | Tagged , , , , , , | 4 Comments

The Tag Conspiracy

It was about 4 years ago when this Hanes ad was given heavy rotation on television. For forty years I had existed without even once consciously thinking that my shirt’s tag made me itchy. But I tell you after seeing that ad a billion times I found myself noticing that my shirt tag on occasion made my back itchy.

I hate it when television does that. It invents a problem whose only fix is the product they are selling. Of course Hanes only made money hand over fist for a small while before many clothing manufacturers also began to sell printed on tags instead of the allegedly itchy kind. On this day, most of my shirts are tag free.

That was step one in the conspiracy.

Step two was making the printed on type of tag self destruct over time. Shown is a photo of a shirt I have that is only 2 ½ years old. The printed type tag should be on the back open and shown part of the shirt. It was there when I bought it but you can clearly see it has completely disappeared. It seemed a slow process but I think that the tag became unreadable after only a year.

So soon will come the coup de grace of the conspiracy. Clothing manufacturers will lobby the government hard to ban used clothing without the tag from being sold. It will be to “protect the consumer”. You see, even second hand users of the clothing should have the information to properly care for the garments to extend their life to the maximum.

Since the printed on tags will be gone after a maximum of a year, second hand clothing will mostly never be resold. Goodbye Value Village and all the charity sellers of used clothing. Even the poor must ante up for new clothing. The tag conspiracy will ensure this.

Posted in Fashion, Humour | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

“My Shower Curtain is a Slut”

The following letter was sent to this site as a comment on my post The Horny Shower Curtain. I have moved it over here to its own area for comments:

Dear Many Rants of Larry Russwurm,

I’ve looked all over the Internet and it seems like you and your site are the biggest experts on shower curtain behaviour on the Internet. Perhaps you can help.

I noticed my shower curtain had a certain attraction to me right when we first bought it. Whenever I was engrossed in cleaning myself in the shower, it would sidle up to me, sometimes even touching my naked body.

But that’s as far as it would go. I am after all a married woman and loyal to my husband.

One time I let it slip to my husband about the shower curtain’s behaviour and he insisted that the very same shower curtain would sidle up to him and also touch his naked body.

We were both taken aback- having thought all along that we were the only one, but decided that the shower curtain was bisexual and it was relatively harmless, after all my husband and I were still very much loyal to one another.

We left it at that.

Our town has an annual rotten tomato throwing event. It happens in our town square. Townsfolk can get out their aggressions by throwing tomatoes at each other in the crowded square. 5 friends were thinking of going so we offered our house and bathroom as a wash up area for afterwards. Our house was closest to the square.

After this dirty event, my husband and I had showered as well as two of our friends. You can imagine my consternation when one of those friends said, “Your shower curtain likes me as much as my own one.”

The other friend said, “It liked me, too. Don’t look now but I think your shower curtain is a slut.”

If it ended up that the shower curtain liked all the adults, it wouldn’t be so bad. But last to go into the shower was my friend’s minor child as well as our own minor child. I began to worry about their safety. My husband sensed my panic and said to each minor, “When it’s your turn you must bathe.”

My husband mumbled something about “You’re so dirty because of the tomatoes.” But now it’s gone back to day to day living and my minor is questioning. What do I say? How do I react?

Many thanks in advance Many Rants, Connie.

First of all Connie, as near as we can figure shower curtains are pansexual, not bisexual.

Secondly, I think you already know what must be done. A shower curtain will never step over the legal line. But still you don’t want your minor to deal with adult issues. You could hang the offending shower curtain over the other side of the tub. This might make some more clean up necessary after each shower. But the shower curtain can still indicate its attraction to even your minor by coming closer when the shower is on even if it won’t be able to touch your minor.

No, the real solution is more expensive. Install a glass enclosure above your tub to keep all shower water and soap inside. I don’t know any contractors in your town who might do it but with enough people to have a public square and a tomato throw, your own town should have one.

Posted in Humour, Politics, Science | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Truth in Advertising

I felt weird the first time I heard the Conservatives of Canada being called Cons. It was even weirder that it was a Conservative Party supporter that I heard it from. I’ve heard it again, also from a Conservative supporter so I guess this is going to be a thing. The above title should give you my take on this turn of events.

I do think the Conservatives are cons. Just to cite one example, they say that they are tough on crime. But the Tom Flanagan affair proves that this is not the case. Tom Flanagan counseled to commit murder on a CBC broadcast. No charges were ever brought forth on this serious matter, despite the much recorded and broadcast evidence. The Conservatives were in charge and fully aware of this crime. The Conservative Party of Canada is thus soft on crime.

So does this truth in advertising apply to all the Canadian parties? The official opposition is the New Democratic Party of Canada. If we take the first syllable and pluralize it, we get the News. Maybe it’s possible that this party has the journalistic integrity of the news. However they’re a bit more honest than the news – they’ll tell you up front that they are partisan. You have to figure that out about certain newspapers and news outlets across the country.

Then the Liberals would be the Libs. Perhaps that has something to do with the Women’s Lib movement. But the NDP and Greens fielded more women candidates in the last election than the Liberals. So we’re at a loss as to the meaning of Libs. Perhaps that is as it should be. After all the Liberals were so alien to most Canadians that they fielded a leader, Michael Ignatieff, who has spent many years living in the United States. And still, in this late day, Canadians are still suspicious of too much American influence in politics.

And last of the major parties, the one that seems to seal the truth in advertising thesis of this post, are the Greens. Green in English can mean new. And of the major parties the Greens are the newest. They are so new that in the last election they got their first elected member of parliament.

Will this truth in advertising thing in politics expand? Can you imagine a politician of any political stripe saying, “Most of what I do is waste time on each topic till the public helps me make up my mind or until my party leader tells me what to do.” Wouldn’t that be mind bending to hear from a politician? And of course it would also be true.

Posted in Humour, Politics | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Musicians are Tone Deaf

Right off the top it might not be all musicians. I am going by all the songs I know in the English speaking world. Why the English language? That, as it turns out, is important.

The English language itself has tonality. And it is that tonality, not musical tonality, that has been thrown out.

Firstly, I’ve found that in speech when there is a rise in pitch for the last word at the end of a sentence, it means the sentence is a question and the speaker is expecting a yes/no answer. I’ve spoken English for over 40 years and hadn’t realized that I and English were that leading. But it’s true.

Indeed the yes/no thing is true of any sentence with a rise in pitch at the end. If the sentence isn’t normally a question, it becomes one with that rise in pitch at the end. “You are an enforcer,” with a rise in pitch for enforcer becomes a yes/no question.

Alright let’s look for a real world music example. The only song book I have is “Yes Complete Deluxe Edition”. I do not recommend buying this type of sheet music. Maybe it’s because Yes was a complex band that much of the music is incorrect. I’ve also checked Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin and Rush sheet music books like this and they are also incorrect. I’m not sure if just complex music is incorrect. I don’t need so much help for easy music. Is it any wonder that guitar tabs have become popular over the Internet? Also this book is incomplete because Yes insisted on reforming more times. So it does not include 90125 and later incarnations.

So for this example we’ll look at Roundabout, their most popular song from this book. I’m going to look up singing lines that finish with higher pitches, thus possibly making a yes/no question.

“I spend the day your way” ends with a high note so we can make it into the yes/no question that English speech would demand. Whether the answer is yes or no we must decide for ourselves as the rest of the song offers no clues. “Call it morning driving through the sound and in and out the valley,” becomes the next yes/no question. “mountains come out of the sky and they stand there?” and “one mile over we’ll be there and we’ll see you?” and “ten true summers we’ll be there and laughing too?” and “of distant atmosphere?” all complete the yes/no questions of this very long song. So what can we conclude by this?

First of all Yes is very rude. Most times they leave no space for a listener to answer yes or no.

Secondly with Yes’ extremely abstract visions the yes/no thing would seem to comment on the reality of their vision. Despite the band’s name, most people would give a resounding “no” as the answer to the visions.

Roger Dean (long time Yes artist and this year’s Kitchener Blues Festival Artist) seems to have given a “yes” to the question “Mountains come out of the sky and they stand there?” A large portion of his work has been floating rocks and mountains and even some with orderly movement. Indeed I’ve heard people say that the Avatar scenery could be called a rip off of Roger Dean’s work.

Let’s get to the next tonality thing I’ve noticed. Bear in mind that the dialect I speak is the urban Ontario, Canada dialect and some dialects of English might not have the same tonalities. That second tonality is for general questions. When I ask a normal question my pitch goes up for the whole question.

So I’m thinking that falsetto sentences could be thought of as questions.

The seventies was seemingly the era of falsetto so I hope you will excuse me if my examples are from then.

So in the song “Bloody Well Right” by Supertramp, when the background singers say in a higher pitch “Quite right?” and “Right?” they are actually asking a question and not helping to assert the main line.

And of course when mentioning falsetto, how could we not mention the Bee Gees, famous in the mid to late seventies for their entirely falsetto songs? Now, due to me, their songs are famous questions. “Blaming it all on the nights of Broadway?” or “Staying Alive?” are two famous examples.

And actually when I first thought of this topic I thought to look at songs with direct questions in them. Most of them don’t use falsetto or other obvious higher pitch. Like the recent “What Do You Got?” by Bon Jovi. And most questions asked musically are not yes/no questions so looking at the last word’s pitch isn’t going to help. So we are safe to conclude that the title of this post is for the most part, true.

And perhaps this article might spawn a couple experimental songs. Indeed there is more about English speech tonality on Wikipedia and other places on the Internet. So there might be even more to work with than my two main points. And if someone is searching for a name for music that includes English tonality, might I suggest “Questionable Music” as a name for any such genre.

Posted in Humour, Language, Music | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment