I’ve never seen the Lombardi Trophy in football till the other day on the Ellen show. On that show Julian Edelman came on carrying the Lombardi trophy which is for the winning team of the Super Bowl. For those who have not seen the Lombardi Trophy it is a tall angular thing that has a silver football on top.
Julian Edelman was named the Super Bowl MVP, or winner of the Pete Rozelle Trophy. When Ellen asked what that trophy looked like I thought (but could have imagined it) that she was confused by Julian Edelman’s answer. “It’s a silver football,” said Edelman or words to that effect.
“Didn’t he already have it then?” I was thinking and it must have caught others off guard in the same way that it caught me.
Then Ellen said she had the Super Bowl MVP trophy for Edelman. She surprised him with the Pete Rozelle Trophy which was a short angular thing with a silver football on top. I may have felt just a touch stupid at this point.
I realized one thing then. Football trophies have a definite lack of originality to them. It almost shows that a lack of creativity exists in our sports spectacles.
Then I thought that the two trophies were a sort of matched set. After all doesn’t the MVP award always go to a member of the Lombardi Trophy winning team?
This theory can’t be true because in 1971 Chuck Howley won the MVP award while his team, the Dallas Cowboys, lost the Super Bowl to the Baltimore Colts. So the argument that the trophies are a set is lost.
Still at least there is some creativity in football. Or else the team trophy would be a gigantic bowl. For those who don’t know it’s called the Super Bowl because of the bowl shape of the stadium the game is played in.
Perhaps Canada can show a little more originality than the US in their professional football. It should be easy to do, after all it’s not likely that the sport has two teams with almost identical names. But then again the Ottawa Rough Riders and the Saskatchewan Roughriders played in the same league and even met each other in the finals four different times.
Oh, football!

We Interview Some of the Ford Government’s New Appointees
LR: Fox Ford, you’ve been chosen as the province’s official chicken inspector. Is there anything you’d like to say to our readers?
FF: Not really. But I’m curious. If I were to, say, reject some meat where would they dispose of it?
LR: I’m not sure. Through proper procedures, I’m sure.
FF: What if I were to offer to take it off their hands. Free and clear. No disposal costs at all for them. Might that save them some money?
LR: Do you not understand how an interview works? I’m supposed to ask the questions.
Now, do you have any direction where you might take food inspection?
FF: I was thinking that really, can’t you tell if meat is good or bad at the farm first? Sorry about that question – it was rhetorical. I’ve always been able to size up a chicken and decide if it was good or bad while it was still alive. My stomach can attest to my 100% accuracy. Anyhow, I think we can move the inspection system to the farms for freshness. The system might be able to save on slaughtering costs as well. Just thinking aloud.
LR: My, Fox Ford, I just can’t seem to look away from your pointy face and red hair. And you look like you’re drowning in that suit.
FF: Do you have something you’re trying to tell me?
LR: There’s the questions again. Just thinking aloud. Like you did. If we’re off on the wrong foot just go.
Fox Ford leaves the interview.
*
LR: Now Sinbad Baddie, you’re the new pot czar for Ontario. May I ask, how do you know the Ford family?
SB: I’m entirely qualified to be pot czar. I used to supply drugs to Ontarians.
LR: Was that crack? And was it to the Ford family?
SB: I object to this line of questioning. You’re just assuming the worst because of my name. Well let me assure you that it is a double negative which is a positive.
LR: It’s a triple negative which is a negative.
SB: Agree to disagree.
LR: Alright. The government way underestimated the potential pot market and there are shortages everywhere province wide. Is that because someone in government asked their dealer and the dealer lied in order to enrich themselves.
SB: I object to this line of questioning, too. Are you trying to out me as a dealer or as a member of government. I can’t decide which.
LR: I am trying to out you both ways.
SB: Now I know why people in politics always use that handy “No comment” answer. No comment.
LR: Do you have anything else the public might want to know?
SB: No comment.
*
LR: Digby Runes, may I just say how glad I am to meet the appointee in charge of manufacturing and industry. I am pleased to say you are not a Ford or a known friend of the Fords.
DR: Yes, yes. I am happy to be here.
LR: You must be an expert in your field to be chosen for this.
DR: Quite right. I have been in middle management in the manufacturing field for years.
LR: Middle management? They could have promoted almost anyone from that. Why you?
DR: I think I bring skills they needed.
LR: Like what?
DR: Like my total commitment to the job. No matter what they want I will try, try, try to make it happen.
LR: So your skill is you try at your job?
DR: Yes, yes.
LR: Digby Runes, are you a Yes man?
DR: Yes, yes. Quite, quite.
LR: As a Yes man, what do you see as your most important goal?
DR: With GM abandoning part of Ontario and Chrysler still being uncompetitive I see an opening with cars for this to be Ford Nation.
LR: Ontario’s not a nation, Canada is.
DR: Things change.
LR: And Ford is getting out of making any cars. It would be more like Honda nation.
DR: SUVs, then. Still Ford Nation.
LR: Doesn’t that sound like a stupid plan to you?
DR: Yes, this interview is over.