This blog hasn’t always had prescience. In fact I’ve never noticed any signs it could predict the future until a few days ago. And it is only one post out of hundreds that is prescient. But the prescience in the post is undeniable.
In “Hug an Oak Tree Today”, I used my awesome powers of pattern recognition to say that first elm trees, then ash trees were wiped out in my part of North America. There was only one type of tree left that was three letters long and started with a vowel. The mighty oak tree was next, or so I figured.
Oak wilt has spread across much of the eastern United States. It has now been spotted near Detroit. Then the Detroit river is all that is stopping Southern Ontario from getting this tree fungus. It is expected to get to my area in only a couple of years.
After a tree is infected it usually dies in less than a year. I gather that all oak species are affected but some get infected more easily than others. Some oaks may be preserved for years by making sure never to prune them in the spring or making sure that infected trees don’t touch roots with uninfected trees. But I gather that all are going to die eventually.
I’m sorry that I brought this on. Me and my ) @ ^^ ^ pattern recognition powers that led to this prescience. I apologize. Perhaps I will in the future try to use my pattern recognition skills for only things that might have a positive outcome. That way prescience won’t sneak up and bite me in the @$$ like it has this time.
Maybe some good will come out of this. Well, obviously not for the environment, but for me. I am writing science fiction that I will eventually publish or have published. It wouldn’t hurt to let the fans know that I predicted the future correctly in the past. Most science fiction writers are lousy at predicting the future so this little bit of prescience will seem impressive to many science fiction fans.
Perhaps there is hope for me. Too bad I couldn’t share this hope with the trees.

We Interview Some of the Ford Government’s New Appointees
LR: Fox Ford, you’ve been chosen as the province’s official chicken inspector. Is there anything you’d like to say to our readers?
FF: Not really. But I’m curious. If I were to, say, reject some meat where would they dispose of it?
LR: I’m not sure. Through proper procedures, I’m sure.
FF: What if I were to offer to take it off their hands. Free and clear. No disposal costs at all for them. Might that save them some money?
LR: Do you not understand how an interview works? I’m supposed to ask the questions.
Now, do you have any direction where you might take food inspection?
FF: I was thinking that really, can’t you tell if meat is good or bad at the farm first? Sorry about that question – it was rhetorical. I’ve always been able to size up a chicken and decide if it was good or bad while it was still alive. My stomach can attest to my 100% accuracy. Anyhow, I think we can move the inspection system to the farms for freshness. The system might be able to save on slaughtering costs as well. Just thinking aloud.
LR: My, Fox Ford, I just can’t seem to look away from your pointy face and red hair. And you look like you’re drowning in that suit.
FF: Do you have something you’re trying to tell me?
LR: There’s the questions again. Just thinking aloud. Like you did. If we’re off on the wrong foot just go.
Fox Ford leaves the interview.
*
LR: Now Sinbad Baddie, you’re the new pot czar for Ontario. May I ask, how do you know the Ford family?
SB: I’m entirely qualified to be pot czar. I used to supply drugs to Ontarians.
LR: Was that crack? And was it to the Ford family?
SB: I object to this line of questioning. You’re just assuming the worst because of my name. Well let me assure you that it is a double negative which is a positive.
LR: It’s a triple negative which is a negative.
SB: Agree to disagree.
LR: Alright. The government way underestimated the potential pot market and there are shortages everywhere province wide. Is that because someone in government asked their dealer and the dealer lied in order to enrich themselves.
SB: I object to this line of questioning, too. Are you trying to out me as a dealer or as a member of government. I can’t decide which.
LR: I am trying to out you both ways.
SB: Now I know why people in politics always use that handy “No comment” answer. No comment.
LR: Do you have anything else the public might want to know?
SB: No comment.
*
LR: Digby Runes, may I just say how glad I am to meet the appointee in charge of manufacturing and industry. I am pleased to say you are not a Ford or a known friend of the Fords.
DR: Yes, yes. I am happy to be here.
LR: You must be an expert in your field to be chosen for this.
DR: Quite right. I have been in middle management in the manufacturing field for years.
LR: Middle management? They could have promoted almost anyone from that. Why you?
DR: I think I bring skills they needed.
LR: Like what?
DR: Like my total commitment to the job. No matter what they want I will try, try, try to make it happen.
LR: So your skill is you try at your job?
DR: Yes, yes.
LR: Digby Runes, are you a Yes man?
DR: Yes, yes. Quite, quite.
LR: As a Yes man, what do you see as your most important goal?
DR: With GM abandoning part of Ontario and Chrysler still being uncompetitive I see an opening with cars for this to be Ford Nation.
LR: Ontario’s not a nation, Canada is.
DR: Things change.
LR: And Ford is getting out of making any cars. It would be more like Honda nation.
DR: SUVs, then. Still Ford Nation.
LR: Doesn’t that sound like a stupid plan to you?
DR: Yes, this interview is over.