The NRA has a new idea that was brainstormed last week following the tragic shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. You’ve undoubtedly heard their call for MORE guns. More specifically they want an armed guard in every school. This will, according to them, discourage school shootings.
Now, if each school only has one armed guard, how are those guards going to break for lunch? Many schools are twisty and turny – a shooter might start on the opposite side of the school that the guard is on and end up with just as many victims as Newtown. So I suspect that one armed guard is just the NRA’s method of getting a foot in the door. Really they almost certainly would want pairs.
And with the socialist point in the title, I can hear the taxpayer screaming “Where is the money going to come from?!” It will of course be up to the government to do this. And that is thinly veiled socialism. The only way it wouldn’t be socialism would be if the armed guards protected some kids and not the others. And that, of course is just immoral.
And the guards can’t be given a simple minimum wage. They have guns, after all. And it wouldn’t be such a bad idea to research and profile each guard. You know, so we don’t put the armed killer in the school and pay him. This is going to cost money, folks. Lots and lots of money.
Or else it just becomes security theatre like in the airports.
And the word kidnapping has kid right in the word. If the guards are going to be protecting kids of rich parents they might decide to take a couple steps across the good/evil line and make at least some parents pay them well.
This is not going to be a popular idea, NRA. Even if your tripe is widely accepted that more guns can decrease school shootings.
Socialism has been a bad word in American politics for some years. So since it fits in describing your latest plan NRA, I hope it sticks to you, a group of obvious socialists.
Then maybe we can get some ridiculous weaponry off the streets.




Pfizer Pfail
Pfizer’s patent on Viagra was pulled in Canada earlier this month. They were caught gaming the patent system by not fully disclosing what the invention was. The point of patents is to get the invention out in the open so at the end of the 20 year monopoly, society has gained.
I brazenly cheered this news because I have had to put up with obnoxious advertising for Viagra for years. But it doesn’t stop there. Anyone with an email account has probably gotten Viagra spam. Especially us middle aged men. The third thing that has really bothered me was all the comment spam I get from this blog site. You are only too right in thinking that Viagra has spammed this site, almost from the very start, and often. So much so it made my comment blacklist at a very early date.
So I am pleased to see Viagra earning less money. I am pleased to see Pfizer punished. But in all my cheering I forgot one thing.
Now there are going to be 3 companies making generic Viagra. We are now going to see advertisements for Niagra. We are going to have more spam in our inboxes thanks to Viagara. Viagara Falls will flow into my comment spam causing a delayed reaction by me in blacklisting it. So for weeks or months I will have to wade through more spam until I figure out which companies are selling the generic Viagra with less obvious names than plays on the name Niagara.
What most disturbs me about this case was that Pfizer won in two lower courts with such an obvious ruse. They probably paid for the best lawyers to extend their product’s monopoly to near the end of its term. So welcome to Canada where only 2 out of every 3 courts are crooked.